Rate This Topic

Average: 0/5

Oil and Gas Development

KBCS Oil and Gas Project is sponsored by a generous grant from the Alaska Conservation Foundation.

The oil and gas industry intends to vastly expand oil and gas drilling in Alaska’s Cook Inlet which threatens Cook Inlet’s ecosystem which contains one of the most productive fisheries in Alaska, supporting one of the state’s premier commercial and sport fishing economies and a subsistence lifestyle for Native Tribes that is centuries old. KBCS is working to ensure that expansion of oil and gas drilling in Cook Inlet will be conducted in a safe and environmental sound manner through pressing new exploratory wells to adopt zero discharge practices and ensuring that blow-out prevention and response tools are available and adequate. 

The significance of the expansion of oil and gas drilling in Cook Inlet is illustrated by fact that existing oil and gas drilling in the Inlet has already severely impacted valuable commercial and subsistence fishing, recreational activities and aquatic habitat. The Inlet, for example, is the only coastal area in the entire nation where oil corporations legally dump billions of gallons of toxic wastes into rich fisheries each year, and is the only major port in North America where laden oil tankers go without tug escorts, in icy waters re-nown for their navigational hazards.

Such problems could be exacerbated by two independent oil companies, Houston-based Escopeta Oil, and Buccaneer Alaska Drilling LLC, an Australian firm, which are attempting independently to bring jack-up rigs to Alaska. The state of Alaska has responded to such efforts by proclaiming that the state is open for business usually at the expense of the environment or human health and welfare. In 2010, for example, regardless of the worst recession in U.S. history the state legislature adopted a lawthat provides a 100-percent subsidy up to $25 million to the first company to drill a well in the pre-Tertiary zone, with lesser subsidies of 90 percent and 80 percent up to $22.5 million and $20 million for the second and third wells respectively. Further, last January, the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority announced it would invest $30 million on bringing the Buccaneer jack-up rig to the Inlet.

Finally, even now, as the nuclear crises unfolds in Japan, Congressional Republicans are ramping up the rhetoric for increased oil and gas drilling to offset the anticipated emphasis on nuclear power in Alaska and elsewhere. If conservationists do not act now to stop the hazardous expansion of oil and gas development of Cook Inlet, the momentum for such development could build so that it is too late. 

Under the Project KBCS’s action will lead to safer standards for oil and gas drilling including prevention of blow-outs the threat from which will be greatly enhanced by expansion of drilling in the Cook Inlet. In 2006, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, for example, weakened oil spill discharge prevention and contingency planning standards and oversight of the oil industry's preparedness. The BP Oil Disaster in the Gulf of Mexico last year should serve as a stark reminder as to just how irresponsible such actions are and just how vulnerable Alaska’s fisheries and the families they support are to spilled oil.

In fact, blowouts occurred on Inlet rigs, in Cook Inlet 1962 and 1987 and today, northern Cook Inlet is laced with an aging oil and gas infrastructure, including 15 offshore oil platforms, hundreds of on-shore wells, and a massive petrochemical complex and one there is one oil spill per month in the Inlet on average resulting from the industry’s poor oversight and old pipelines. It is unknown at this time whether the state’s Inlet response measures are sufficient to handle a blowout from new wells because the proposed drilling anticipates sinking wells into previously untapped “pre-Tertiary” formations containing unknown pressures. As illustrated by what happened in the Gulf recently, Cook Inlet’s ecosystem and economy would not soon recover from the damage caused by a blowout that took weeks or months to seal.  

We will collaborate with other conservation organizations and tribal entities in Cook Inlet including Cook InletKeeper, the Alaska Inter Tribal Council, the Cook Inlet Marine Mammel Council and other conservationists and Native Villages to develop a coalition modeled based on the Bristol Bay OCS Group (Group) to address oil and gas development in Cook Inlet. KBCS is currently a member of the Group and will consult with the Group about assisting with our efforts related to protecting Cook Inlet from similar threats to those that Bristol Bay is facing. 


Cook Inlet Jack Up Rigs 




  • Are our heads in the sand? Featured Article Are our heads in the sand? Are our heads in the sand?

    http://homertribune.com/2011/08/are-our-heads-in-the-sand/ By Hal Shepherd Just before the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico last summer, basing it’s... More »

  • Alaska Shale: Cook Inlet companies eye... Featured News Article Alaska Shale: Cook Inlet companies eye... Alaska Shale: Cook Inlet companies eye...

    While most of the focus in Alaska is on shale oil plays on the North Slope, at least two oil and gas companies in the Cook Inlet basin are looking at checking out the source rock,... More »

  • Energy Blog Featured Blog Post Energy Blog Energy Blog

    9/24/11 Finding a safe approach http://www.starzhost.com/petroleumnews/pdfarch/639418641.pdf#page=1 AOGCC seeks view on the future of Alaska offshore oil & gas drilling... More »

Recently Updated
Study shows it takes only one spill Last Updated on 2011-09-21 16:27:43 • So far, marine transportation in Cook Inlet waters has been lucky given heavy vessel traffic but are agencies ready? By Jenny Neyman Special to the Tribune Given the myriad risk factors of an oil spill that a new Cook Inlet marine transportation study will be considering, the wonder isn’t the danger that spills could occur, it’s the fact that there haven’t been more of them. “We’ve been very lucky,” said Tim Robertson of Nuka Research and Planning, which is facilitating the study. “Any of these kind of catastrophic or very serious oil spills are very low frequency events, and we’ve just been lucky that we haven’t had a serious incident. All of the parts and pieces are here for a very serious type of accident.” The level of risk of an oil spill is a product of frequency and consequence, Robertson said... More »
White Paper - BAT and Zero Discharge in Cook Inlet Last Updated on 2011-09-08 00:00:00 A Homer based conservation group released a report addressing measures it believes are necessary to prevent oil and gas blowouts of the type that occurred in the Gulf of Mexico last summer and other impacts to the economy and marine environment of Cook Inlet. The Kachemak Bay Conservation Society of Homer, released a 17 page White Paper today arguing that Alaska state regulations make plain that spill prevention contingency plans for oil and gas drilling platforms in Cook Inlet must cover all aspects of such spill prevention and containment. According to the group, with the increasing development of oil and gas resources in northern Cook Inlet (as illustrated by the recent arrival of a jack-up rig owned by the Escopeta Oil Company a couple of weeks ago), federal and state governmental agencies and the oil and gas industry have a responsibility to insure that such development is safe... More »
Are our heads in the sand? Last Updated on 2011-09-02 00:00:00 http://homertribune.com/2011/08/are-our-heads-in-the-sand/ By Hal Shepherd Just before the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico last summer, basing it’s conclusion that a massive oil spill was “unlikely” in the area, the Department of the Interior decided not to impose a full review of potential environmental impacts of the drilling operation. Now that it is clear that unpreparedness was one of the factors leading to the tragic loss of life and economic and environment impacts from in the Gulf oil blowout, one would think that we would have seen that last of “unlikely to happen” as a prevention strategy. Not so in Alaska. In fact, even as local communities and fish and wildlife populations attempt to recover from the Gulf spill, the Escopeta Oil Company (which recently transported an exploratory drilling platform to northern Cook... More »
BOEMRE Releases Study on Incorporating Climate Effects into Oil-Spill Risk Analysis Last Updated on 2011-08-30 09:02:35   WASHINGTON - The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) today released a new report evaluating how climate change may affect the environmental conditions measured and used in mathematical modeling for oil-spill trajectory analysis in the Arctic region.  Key findings from the study include recommendations on the scientific methodology to use in explaining recent, rapidly changing Arctic conditions.   "As we make decisions regarding potential energy development in the Arctic, we need the best scientific data available to understand the impact of the changing climate," said BOEMRE Director Michael R. Bromwich. "This study will help improve our computer modeling and analyses and adds to the growing body of research regarding effects of climate change on the Arctic marine environment."   The two-year... More »
NOAA administrator discusses Inlet oil, gas industry, belugas Last Updated on 2011-08-29 00:00:00   .hmmessage P { PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px } BODY.hmmessage { FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt } .hmmessage P { PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px } BODY.hmmessage { FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt } http://www.adn.com/2011/08/23/2028626/noaa-administrator-discusses-inlet.html By LISA DEMER ldemer@adn.com Published: August 24th, 2011 04:49 PM Last Modified: August 24th, 2011 04:50 PM U.S. Sen. Mark Begich and a top Obama administration official sat down Tuesday with Cook Inlet gas and oil interests to discuss whether... More »